|
猪头 ^@@^ PCBETA Alpha

猪头 猪身 猪脑 猪尾巴~ - UID
- 257240
- 帖子
- 68
- 积分
- 34
- PB币
- 659
- 贡献
- 0
- 家族
- Mac Fans
- 阅读权限
- 10
|
5楼
大 中
小 发表于 2008-11-9 01:38 只看该作者
4. 系统评分
先来说说Vista评分。 不管Vista评分准确与否,做个参考还算是不错
总分: 4.0
CPU: 4.9
内存: 5.9
Windows Aero: 4.3
游戏性能: 4.0
硬盘性能: 5.5
相比dv5t 1000CTO笔记本的 Intel P8600 + GeForce 9600M GT相比
总分: 5.0
CPU: 5.2
内存: 5.9
Windows Aero: 5.0
游戏性能: 5.3
硬盘性能: 5.4
由于HD 3450和GeForce 9600GT之间的差距我们暂且不做讨论,光2.4GHz的P8600和2.1GHz的Puma ML-80的0.3分的差距,以及处理器之间的0.3GHz的频率差距,Puma还算一个不错的低价平台
由于个人没有足够测试环境,于是从www.notebookreview.com摘录了一些测试结果,原文: http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4486
The following benchmarks are from www.notebookreview.com. The original content is at http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=4486
wPrime 所用时间对比(数值越小越好):Notebook / CPU | wPrime 32M time | HP Pavilion dv5z (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 @ 2.1GHz)
| 39.745s
| Dell Inspiron 1525 (Core 2 Duo T7250 @ 2.0GHz)
| 43.569s
| Dell XPS M1530 (Core 2 Duo T7500 @ 2.2GHz) | 37.485s | HP Pavilion dv6500z (Turion 64 X2 TL-60 @ 2.0GHz)
| 40.759s
| Sony VAIO NR (Core 2 Duo T5250 @ 1.5GHz) | 58.233s | Toshiba Tecra A9 (Core 2 Duo T7500 @ 2.2GHz) | 38.343s | Toshiba Tecra M9 (Core 2 Duo T7500 @ 2.2GHz) | 37.299s | HP Compaq 6910p (Core 2 Duo T7300 @ 2GHz) | 40.965s | Sony VAIO TZ (Core 2 Duo U7600 @ 1.20GHz) | 76.240s | Zepto 6024W (Core 2 Duo T7300 @ 2GHz) | 42.385s | Lenovo T61 (Core 2 Duo T7500 @ 2.2GHz) | 37.705s | Alienware M5750 (Core 2 Duo T7600 @ 2.33GHz) | 38.327s | HP Pavilion dv6000z (Turion X2 TL-60 @ 2.0GHz) | 38.720s |
在wPrime 32M测试中,拥有主频2.1GHz Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80处理器的HP Pavilion dv5z突破了40s大关,性能介于Core 2 Duo T7300和T7500之间,与Turion X2 TL-60性能类似,并没有明显的性能提升。
PCMark05 评定笔记本综合能力(评分越高越好):
| Notebook | PCMark05 Score | HP Pavilion dv5z (2.1GHz Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, ATI Radeon HD 3200)
| 3,994 PCMarks
| | Dell Inspiron 1525 (2.0GHz Intel T7250, Intel X3100) | 4,149 PCMarks
| | Dell XPS M1530 (2.20GHz Intel T7500, Nvidia 8600M GT 256MB) | 5,412 PCMarks | | Dell Inspiron 1520 (2.0GHz Intel T7300, NVIDIA 8600M GT) | 4,616 PCMarks | | Dell XPS M1330 (2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, NVIDIA GeForce Go 8400M GS) | 4,591 PCMarks | | Lenovo ThinkPad X61 (2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, Intel X3100) | 4,153 PCMarks | | Lenovo 3000 V200 (2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, Intel X3100) | 3,987 PCMarks | | Lenovo T60 Widescreen (2.0GHz Intel T7200, ATI X1400 128MB) | 4,189 PCMarks | | HP dv6000t (2.16GHz Intel T7400, NVIDA GeForce Go 7400) | 4,234 PCMarks | | Fujitsu N6410 (1.66GHz Core Duo, ATI X1400) | 3,487 PCMarks | | Alienware M7700 (AMD Athlon FX-60, Nvidia Go 7800GTX) | 5,597 PCMarks | | Sony VAIO SZ-110B in Speed Mode (Using Nvidia GeForce Go 7400) | 3,637 PCMarks | | Asus V6J (1.86GHz Core Duo T2400, Nvidia Go 7400) | 3,646 PCMarks |
3DMark06 比较成绩(越高越好):
| Notebook | 3DMark06 Score | | HP Pavilion dv5z (2.1GHz Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, ATI Radeon HD 3200) | 1,599 3DMarks
| Dell Inspiron 1525 (2.0GHz Intel T7250, Intel X3100)
| 545 3DMarks
| | HP Pavilion dv6500z (2.0GHz AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60, NVIDIA 8400m GS) | 1,551 3DMarks
| Sony VAIO NR (1.5GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T5250, Intel X3100)
| 504 3DMarks | | Dell XPS M1530 (2.20GHz Intel T7500, Nvidia 8600M GT 256MB) | 4,332 3DMarks | | Dell Inspiron 1520 (2.0GHz Intel T7300, NVIDIA 8600M GT) | 2,905 3DMarks | | Dell XPS M1330 (2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, NVIDIA GeForce Go 8400M GS 128MB) | 1,408 3DMarks | | Alienware Area 51 m5550 (2.33GHz Core 2 Duo, nVidia GeForce Go 7600 256MB | 2,183 3DMarks | | HP dv6000t (2.16 GHz Intel T7400, NVIDA GeForce Go 7400) | 827 3DMarks |
但是在3DMark06的测试中,HP Pavilion dv5z取得了1599分的好成绩,将英特尔GMA X3100远远的抛在了后面,性能甚至超越了8400M GS独立显卡,集成显卡效能不佳的传统观念被彻底打破。
3DMark05 成绩比较(越高越好):
| Notebook | 3DMark05 Results | | HP Pavilion dv5z (2.1GHz Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, ATI Radeon HD 3200) | 2,969 3DMarks
| | Dell XPS M1330 (2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T7300, NVIDIA GeForce Go 8400M GS 128MB) | 3,116 3DMarks | | HP Compaq 6510b (2.20GHz Intel Core 2 Duo T7500, Intel X3100) | 916 3DMarks | | HP Compaq 6515b (1.6GHz AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-52, ATI x1270) | 871 3DMarks | | HP dv6000t (2.16 GHz Intel T7400, NVIDA GeForce Go 7400) | 2,013 3D Marks | | Dell Inspiron e1705 (2.0GHz Core Duo, ATI X1400) | 1,791 3D Marks | | Acer TravelMate 8204WLMi (2.0GHz Core Duo, ATI X1600 256MB) | 4,236 3DMarks | | Alienware Aurora M-7700(AMD Dual Core FX-60, ATI X1600 256MB) | 7,078 3D Marks | | Lenovo ThinkPad T60 (2.0GHz Core Duo, ATI X1400 128MB) | 2,092 3D Marks | | Asus V6Va (2.13 GHz Pentium M, ATI x700 128 MB) | 2,530 3D Marks | | Fujitsu n6410 (1.66 GHz Core Duo, ATI X1400 128MB) | 2,273 3DMarks | | Dell XPS M1210 (2.16 GHz Core Duo, nVidia Go 7400 256MB) | 2,090 3D Marks |
我们在3D Mark 05中能看到,Puma平台的性能甚至能和8400M GS相比,并且超越先进主流集成显卡,可见这次的升级,效果可不一般啊
从notebookrebiew.com的评测中,我们还能发现硬盘的测试成绩

平均48.4MB/s的速度任然不是特别理想,不过好在我身边有一块7200.3的320G硬盘,过会儿装上去吧!
最后的温度测试,任然是notebookreview.com的资源(注意,以下温度均是华氏度)


电池寿命,独立显卡HD 3450使用HP的6芯电池只能续航1个小时左右,不甚理想
|